ALEXANDER HAD PERSIAN BLOODLINE
UNBELIEVABLE - ALEXANDER HAD PERSIAN BLOODLINE : In Persian and Zoroastrian literature, Alexander the Great is given the epithet "the Accursed" (or gizistag in Middle Persian). This refers to alternative historical perspective, which contrasts sharply with the WESTERN view of him as a heroic figure. For centuries the West has glorified Alexander as “the Great,” judging him only through the lens of conquest. But the Persian narrative — preserved in the SHAHNAMEH of FIRDAUSI — reveals a deeper, older and morally superior TRUTH.
Alexander’s True Lineage — The Achaemenid Bloodline ; Firdausi records that Alexander (Iskandar) was the firstborn son of Darius (Darab) of the Persian Achaemenid dynasty. His mother, troubled by signs during her pregnancy, was sent back to her father. There she gave birth to Alexander, and only later married Philip — giving Western historians an artificial excuse to claim him as Macedonian. So when Firdausi — a Zoroastrian-hearted Persian — recorded Alexander’s lineage, he did so with the cultural duty of truth. His account is consistent with the moral DNA of the Persian race. This is why Firdausi’s narrative carries weight — because Persians valued truth over glory. Alexander the Curse is not just a phrase; it is a correction of history through the eyes of those who preserved truth for millennia — our Zoroastrian ancestors, the Shahnameh, and the moral legacy of Humata, Hukhta, Hvarshta.A son of Persia turned against Persia. Alexander the Great? No. Alexander the Cursed. To the West — “Alexander the Great.”, To Persia — heirs of Cyrus, Darius, and Xerxes: He is Iskandar-e-Gojastak — Alexander the Curse.
NOW, WHY I DO NOT 'TRUST' Alexander's narratives (by Greek / Western Scholars) being propagated against his conflict in Ancient India (Bharat) with PORUS.

Comments
Post a Comment